ISSN: 2459-1777 | E-ISSN 2587-0394
Volume : 10 Issue : 4 Year : 2025
pdf

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Insulin Eye Drops for Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Assessment [Beyoglu Eye J]
Beyoglu Eye J. 2025; 10(4): 195-205 | DOI: 10.14744/bej.2025.00821

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Insulin Eye Drops for Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Assessment

Muhammad Alfatih1, Christina Wunardi2, Alfiani Zukhruful Fitri Rifai3
1Universitas Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Jakarta, Indonesia
2Universitas Gadjah Mada, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3Universitas Airlangga, Faculty of Medicine, Surabaya, Indonesia

Objectives: The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of topical insulin eye drops (TIED) in treating corneal epithelial defects (CED).
Methods: We registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD420251051879). A systematic literature search on PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar until May 2025 was done to identify controlled comparative studies. Outcomes of interest include time to complete re-epithelialization, re-epithelialization rate, treatment failure, recurrence, and adverse events. We performed meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence for each result using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. Results: Seven studies involving 238 patients were included in the analysis. TIED significantly shortened re-epithelialization time (mean difference [MD] –1.20 days [−1.71–−0.69], p<0.0001) and accelerated the healing rate (MD +0.26 mm2/h [0.10–0.42], p=0.002). In addition, TIED significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] 0.30 [0.16–0.57], p=0.003) and recurrence (RR 0.25 [0.11–0.56], p=0.0007) compared to conventional treatments, with no adverse events reported. GRADE assessments indicated very low to low certainty of evidence.
Conclusion: TIED may speed corneal healing, cut failures and recurrences, and is well-tolerated and inexpensive. Robust randomized controlled trials are still needed to nail down the optimal dosing, long-term safety, and its role in CED management.

Keywords: Corneal epithelial defect, Corneal wound healing, Ocular surface disease, Topical insulin


Corresponding Author: Muhammad Alfatih, Indonesia
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale