ISSN: 2459-1777  |  e-ISSN: 2587-0394
Twenty Years of Anophthalmic Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Etiologies, Surgical Trends, and Clinical Findings [Beyoglu Eye J]
Beyoglu Eye J. 2026; 11(3): 205-212 | DOI: 10.14744/bej.2026.89896

Twenty Years of Anophthalmic Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Etiologies, Surgical Trends, and Clinical Findings

Ali Safa Balci1, Husna Topcu2, Merve Emul3, Mehmet Goksel Ulas4, Ayse Cetin Efe4, Fatma Poslu Karademir4, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk5
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
2Department of Ophthalmology, Osmangazi Aritmi Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye
3Department of Ophthalmology, Ercis Sehit Ridvan Cevik State Hospital, Van, Türkiye
4Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
5Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Body Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the etiological causes, demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, implant features, com-plications, and additional surgical interventions in patients undergoing anophthalmic surgery over a 20-year period.
METHODS: The records of patients who underwent evisceration, enucleation, sphere exchange, secondary sphere im-plantation, and anophthalmic socket reconstruction at our institution between 2003 and 2023 were reviewed. Etiologic and demographic data, surgical procedures, orbital implant diameter and material, postoperative complications, additional surgical procedures, and follow-up periods were recorded. Female patients were classified as group 1 and male patients as group 2, and both groups were subjected to comparative analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 603 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (female, 32.2%) and Group 2 (male, 67.8%). The mean age at the time of surgery was comparable between the two groups (p=0.830). Trauma was the most common etiology, malignancy the least common. Evisceration was the most frequently performed procedure, and enucleation the least. The mean diameter of implanted spheres was significantly smaller in Group 1 (p=0.001). No significant difference in implant materials was observed (p=0.590). Conjunctival suture dehiscence and infection were the most common compli-cations, showing similar profiles in both groups.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Trauma was the leading cause in both groups, with evisceration as the most frequently performed proce-dure. These procedures addressed the underlying ocular pathologies and contributed to orbital volume restoration when indicated.

Keywords: Anophthalmic Surgeries, anophthalmic socket reconstruction, enucleation, evisceration, sphere exchange, sphere implantation


Corresponding Author: Ali Safa Balci, Türkiye
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale